1959 Austin A 55 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin A 55. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 55 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 55 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |