1959 Austin A 55 vs. 1992 Buick Regal
To start off, 1992 Buick Regal is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Buick Regal (170 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Buick Regal weights approximately 220 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Regal (298 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 55 | 1992 Buick Regal | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 55 | Regal |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2740 mm |