1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Neon weights approximately 41 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (177 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 55 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1161 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
