1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
| Model | A 55 | SS |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
