1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 55 | LMP |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3090 mm |
