1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2002 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 332 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2002 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 55 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1452 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 61 L |
