1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 55 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 55 | 5 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 201 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |