1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 55 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 55 weights approximately 68 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2009 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 55 | Note |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |
