1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1226 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm) has 483 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 55 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 55 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 551 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2346 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5817 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3569 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |
