1959 Austin A 90 vs. 2013 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2013 Ford Fusion is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Fusion (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Fusion weights approximately 10 kg more than 1959 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Fusion (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 90. (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 90. 2013 Ford Fusion has automatic transmission and 1959 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1959 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Fusion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 90 | 2013 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | Fusion |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 63 L |