1959 Austin A 95 vs. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe
To start off, 1959 Austin A 95 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 95 (91 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. (85 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 72 kg more than 1959 Austin A 95.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 95 | 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 95 | DeLuxe |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 3546 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1397 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 63 L |
