1959 Austin A 95 vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 1959 Austin A 95 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 95 (91 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 95 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin A 95 1952 Holden FX
Make Austin Holden
Model A 95 FX
Year Released 1959 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2638 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 91 HP 51 HP
Torque 176 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1325 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2620 mm