1959 Austin A 95 vs. 1992 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 1992 Ford Fiesta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 95 | 1992 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 95 | Fiesta |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2450 mm |