1959 Austin A 95 vs. 2001 Toyota RunX

To start off, 2001 Toyota RunX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RunX (104 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 95. (91 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 95 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 Toyota RunX.

Because 1959 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota RunX. (141 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota RunX. 2001 Toyota RunX has automatic transmission and 1959 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1959 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota RunX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin A 95 2001 Toyota RunX
Make Austin Toyota
Model A 95 RunX
Year Released 1959 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2638 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 91 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 141 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 75.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 84.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1325 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4180 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]