1959 Austin A 95 vs. 2008 Peugeot 1007
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 1007 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 95 (91 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2008 Peugeot 1007. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 2008 Peugeot 1007. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 95 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 1007. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 1007, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 1007. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 1007. 2008 Peugeot 1007 has automatic transmission and 1959 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1959 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Peugeot 1007 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 95 | 2008 Peugeot 1007 | |
| Make | Austin | Peugeot |
| Model | A 95 | 1007 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |
