1959 Austin A 99 vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 290 kg more than 1959 Austin A 99.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 99 | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
| Model | A 99 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3130 mm |
