1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 1948 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 727 kg more than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | 1948 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | 3000 | 62 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 5674 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1143 kg | 1870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3210 mm |