1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 weights approximately 223 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Simca |
Model | 3000 | 8 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1143 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2430 mm |