1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 1966 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1966 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | 1966 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lancia |
Model | 3000 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1143 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |