1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 has manual transmission. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 3000 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1959 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4690 mm |