1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 2002 Citroen C8

To start off, 2002 Citroen C8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C8 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C8 weights approximately 544 kg more than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (237 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C8. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C8.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin-Healey 3000 2002 Citroen C8
Make Austin-Healey Citroen
Model 3000 C8
Year Released 1959 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2911 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1143 kg 1687 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 47 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]