1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 2002 Mazda 6

To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 282 kg more than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (237 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin-Healey 3000 2002 Mazda 6
Make Austin-Healey Mazda
Model 3000 6
Year Released 1959 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2911 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1143 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]