1959 Berkeley B 95 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley B 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley B 95 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1777 kg more than 1959 Berkeley B 95.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley B 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Berkeley B 95 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Berkeley | Cadillac |
| Model | B 95 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 690 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 363 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1780 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 79 L |
