1959 Berkeley B 95 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley B 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley B 95 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1177 kg more than 1959 Berkeley B 95.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley B 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley B 95. (58 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley B 95.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley B 95 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Berkeley | Chevrolet |
Model | B 95 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 690 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 363 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1780 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 57 L |