1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1962 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1494 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Berkeley | Ford |
Model | QB | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 691 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 40 L |