1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 981 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Berkeley QB | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Berkeley | Mercury |
| Model | QB | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 692 cc | 4728 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 129 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 1362 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2830 mm |
