1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1985 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Mustang (87 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Mustang weights approximately 804 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 1985 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Berkeley | Ford |
Model | QB | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 692 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2560 mm |