1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Berkeley QB 1996 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Berkeley Chevrolet
Model QB Camaro
Year Released 1959 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 691 cc 3349 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 39 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 58 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 381 kg 1413 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1380 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1170 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 1990 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 25 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]