1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1959 Berkeley QB has manual transmission. 1959 Berkeley QB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Berkeley | Mitsubishi |
Model | QB | FTO |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 692 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 202 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1300 mm |