1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 692 cc (2 cylinders), 1959 Berkeley QB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 MCC Smart weights approximately 269 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Berkeley QB | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Berkeley | MCC |
| Model | QB | Smart |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 692 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
