1959 Berkeley QB vs. 2002 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 1054 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB. 2002 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 1959 Berkeley QB has manual transmission. 1959 Berkeley QB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 2002 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Berkeley | Daewoo |
Model | QB | Evanda |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 692 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 131 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 65 L |