1959 Berkeley QB vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP) has 252 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1419 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1959 Berkeley QB has manual transmission. 1959 Berkeley QB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Berkeley QB 2002 Jaguar XJ
Make Berkeley Jaguar
Model QB XJ
Year Released 1959 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 692 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 49 HP 301 HP
Torque 61 Nm 541 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 381 kg 1800 kg
Wheelbase Size 1990 mm 3040 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]