1959 Berkeley QB vs. 2003 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2003 Mercury Sable is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercury Sable (152 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercury Sable weights approximately 1184 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercury Sable (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB. 2003 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1959 Berkeley QB has manual transmission. 1959 Berkeley QB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Berkeley QB 2003 Mercury Sable
Make Berkeley Mercury
Model QB Sable
Year Released 1959 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 691 cc 2982 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 39 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 58 Nm 246 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 89.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 79 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 381 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1380 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1170 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 1990 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 25 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]