1959 Berkeley QB vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 351 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Berkeley | Cadillac |
Model | QB | CTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 692 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 400 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 64 L |