1959 Berkeley QB vs. 2012 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1653 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Berkeley QB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB. 2012 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1959 Berkeley QB has manual transmission. 1959 Berkeley QB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 2012 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Berkeley | SsangYong |
Model | QB | Rodius |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 692 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 80 L |