1959 Berkeley Twosome vs. 1963 Cadillac 62

To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley Twosome. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley Twosome would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1835 kg more than 1959 Berkeley Twosome.

Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley Twosome, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Berkeley Twosome 1963 Cadillac 62
Make Berkeley Cadillac
Model Twosome 62
Year Released 1959 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 328 cc 6390 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 18 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 305 kg 2140 kg
Vehicle Length 3130 mm 5670 mm
Vehicle Height 1060 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 1790 mm 3300 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]