1959 BMW 502 vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1965 Mazda R 360 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 BMW 502 (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 BMW 502 weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW 502 | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 502 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 384 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |