1959 BMW 502 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 BMW 502 weights approximately 223 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1959 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1959 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW 502 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 502 | Astro |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |