1959 BMW 502 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 568 kg more than 1959 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW 502 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 502 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |