1959 BMW 503 vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1959 BMW 503 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 BMW 503 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 BMW 503 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 BMW 503 | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | BMW | Riley |
| Model | 503 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2870 mm |
