1959 BMW 507 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 BMW 507 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1959 BMW 507. (148 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW 507. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1959 BMW 507. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 BMW 507 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 507 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3300 mm |
