1959 BMW 507 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW 507. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW 507 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 BMW 507 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 BMW 507 (148 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 BMW 507 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1959 BMW 507.
Because 1959 BMW 507 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 BMW 507. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 BMW 507. (220 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 BMW 507.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW 507 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 507 | 6 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2610 mm |