1959 BMW Isetta vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1959 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 906 kg more than 1959 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 BMW Isetta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 BMW Isetta | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Isetta | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 124 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1266 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2210 mm |
