1959 BMW Isetta vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 799 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 MCC ForTwo (40 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1959 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 370 kg more than 1959 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 BMW Isetta | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | Isetta | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
