1959 BMW Isetta vs. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1959 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1740 kg more than 1959 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 BMW Isetta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW Isetta | 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Isetta | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2880 mm |