1959 BMW Isetta vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1959 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1959 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 BMW Isetta | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Isetta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 215 HP |
| Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 238 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2750 mm |
