1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 469 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1949 Hudson Commodore has manual transmission. 1949 Hudson Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Hudson |
Model | 62 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1959 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3160 mm |