1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | FX |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |
