1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 62 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 164 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3690 mm |
