1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1951 Jeep CJ3A has manual transmission. 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2040 mm |
